We’re over halfway through 2026, so it’s worth asking where food innovation is actually heading. The answer isn’t novelty. The products gaining ground this year aren’t the loudest or the newest – they’re the ones built around purpose.
Four shifts are shaping the category. Each one changes how you formulate, and just as importantly, what you’re allowed to say on the label.
For years, “healthy” was enough. Now consumers want a specific outcome: energy, gut health, satiety, metabolism support, and they want to know which ingredient delivers it.
That’s a formulation shift, but it’s also a claims shift. A vague “supports wellbeing” message asks almost nothing of you. A targeted benefit asks a great deal. The moment you connect an ingredient to a health outcome, you’ve moved into health claim territory under Standard 1.2.7, and every one of those claims has to be either pre-approved or self-substantiated and notified before it goes on pack. The more specific the promise, the higher the evidence bar sits.
High protein, high fibre, low carb, keto – the single-nutrient obsession is fading. Chasing one extreme number is giving way to diversity: a wider range of grains, legumes, plants and emerging proteins, rather than one hero macro.
For most of these ingredients, the reformulation is straightforward. Emerging proteins are the exception worth watching. If an ingredient doesn’t have a history of human consumption in Australia or New Zealand, it may be a novel food – which means it needs FSANZ assessment before it can be sold, not after. Diversity is a strong direction to build in. Just make sure your ingredient list isn’t quietly running ahead of the regulation.
Private label is booming, and at the same time more than a quarter of consumers are actively cutting back on ultra-processed foods. Put those two together, and the signal is clear: shoppers want simpler products at a fairer price.
That has turned the clean label into a genuine competitive advantage. But “clean label” isn’t a regulated term, and “natural” isn’t a defined claim in the Food Standards Code, so the advantage lives entirely in what you can legitimately say and show. A short ingredient list does most of the talking on its own; the compliance work is making sure the claims you build around it can actually hold up.
This one might surprise you. Fermentation, heritage grains, old-school preservation – consumers are reaching for the familiar as a source of trust in uncertain times.
Familiar doesn’t always mean simple on paper, though. A traditional fermentation process can still introduce an ingredient that reads as novel to a regulator, and “traditional” or “authentic” positioning has to line up with your actual formulation and origin claims. The story is what sells the product. The substantiation is what protects it.
Targeted benefits, ingredient diversity, clean labels, authenticity – every one of those trends lands on your label as a claim you have to stand behind. Sort the claims before the artwork, not after.
Every one of this year’s trends- targeted benefits, ingredient diversity, clean labels, authenticity, eventually lands on your label as a claim you have to stand behind. The brands that get this right sort the compliance side early, while formulation and packaging are still on the table, not after the artwork’s at the printer. If you’d like that checked properly before you commit, that’s the work we do with food brands every day. We’re booked out for the next few weeks, but you can join the waitlist here: https://nprconsulting.com.au/contact/
